CIVE 633 - ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY

FACTORS AFFECTING EUTROPHICATION

FACTORS RELATED TO THE DRAINAGE BASIN

  • Factors include location, climate, hydrology, geology, and the physiography and geochemistry of the drainage basin.

  • Each of these factors can significantly influence the input of nutrients to a waterbody.

    Climate

  • Climate can affect annual water temperature, length of growing season, direction and velocity of winds, the quantity of precipitation, and the thermal structure of the waterbody.

  • Lake productivity is inversely related to latitude and altitude.

    Hydrology

  • Generally, for a given drainage basin, the greater the rainfall, the greater the quantity of water and nutrients transported to a waterbody over the annual cycle.

  • Transport of sediments does not increase indefinitely with rainfall.

  • Sediment trasport and erosion is usually maximal at 300 mm annual precipitation; about 50 mm annual runoff.

  • In tropical/subtropical regions, the highest level of biological productivity are usually seen in lakes and reservoirs two to three months after the rainy season.

    Geology

  • Chemical composition is influenced by the geological composition, size and topography of the drainage basin.

  • In watersheds with little or no cultural impact, P is usually supplied to a waterbody by direct atmospheric precipitation and by weathering and associated runoff.

  • Phosphate occurs in igneous rocks in the range of 0.07-0.13%.

  • Sedimentary rocks are generally highest in phosphates.

  • Other things being equal, differences in nutrient regime are related to the soil fertility.

  • Upstream reservoirs serve as sink for sediments, and downstream reservoirs do not show as much nutrients.

  • Nutrient inputs are greater in watersheds wih steeper slopes.

  • Nitrate in rainfall can increase nitrate in lakes and reservoirs.

  • Biological nitrification and denitrification can affect nutrient flux.

    Anthropogenic factors

  • Lake Washington experienced severe phytoplankton problems resulting from sewage inputs.

  • Following complete diversion, it has recovered.

  • Other things being equal, lakes located in watersheds with substantial amounts of agricultural or urban land usage are usually more eutrophic than lakes located in forested watersheds.

  • Fundamental factors affecting nutrient and sediment loads from non-point sources include land form, land use intensity, and usage of materials.

  • Land form characteristics refer to soil texture, soil chemistry, type of soils, drainage density, and slope.

  • Soil texture is the single most important factor affecting nutrient input to the Great Lakes.

  • Greatest surface runoff and associated nutrient inputs was correlated with clayey soils.

  • Calcareous soils often produce high P concentrations in land runoff.

FACTORS RELATED TO THE WATERBODY

  • The characteristics of the waterbody can modify the effects of basic factors.

  • Mean depth of lake and hypolimnion can substantially affect the impacts of increased nutrient loads to a waterbody

  • The oxygen content in the hypolimnion during periods of thermal stratification, and the related processes of water quality deterioration depend to a large degree on the mean depth of the hypolimnion.

  • For the same quantity of phytoplankton produced in the euphotic zone, the oxygen consumption per unit volume will usually be much greater in waterbodies with small hypolimnetic mean depths.

  • In Baltic lakes, a waterbody of mean depth greater than 18 m is a prerequisite for oligotrophic conditions.

    In-lake nutrient sources

  • The role of bottom sediments can be a major concern.

  • In oligotrophic lakes, a substantial portion of the imported nutrients is retained in the sediments.

  • A net deposition of P into the bottom sediments also occurs annually in many eutrophic lakes and reservoirs.

  • In overloaded lakes, P can be released from the sediments.

  • Sudden reduction in input of P will prompt release from the sediments.

  • Release of P from sediments involves physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms.

  • Such factors as redox conditions, nitrate concentration, mineralization, gas bubble formation, bioturbation, effects of phytoplankton and macrophytes, different sediment characteristics, high pH values, diffusion and wind turbulence have been mentioned.

  • Water temperature and water renewal are very important.

  • These induced chemical and microbiological processes which regulate the exchange of substances between the sediments and the water column.

    Flushing rate

  • The extent to which nutrients accumulate in a waterbody also depends greatly on both rainfall and flushing rate.

  • For example, in closed lake basins in arid regions, dissolved P concentrations can be as high as levels in waste treatment lagoons.

  • If the inflow volume Q of a lake or reservoir is very high compared to its volume V, phytoplankton can be flushed out of the waterbody before they can grow to nuisance levels.

  • Experience suggests that a hydraulic residence time greater than about 3 days is a prerequisite for excessive phytoplankton growths.

    Biological controls

  • Zooplankton can be used to control phytoplankton.

  • This is an example of "biomanipulation."

  • This technique requires detailed knowledge of the food-web structure of a lake or reservoir.

    Macrophyte growths

  • Macrophytes cannot compete with phytoplankton in lakes and reservoirs containing very high dissolved P and N concentrations.

  • This is due to the shading effects of high algal densities.

  • Submerged macrophytes are usually not present in waterbodies exhibiting dense phytoplankton growths.

  • One must be careful that control measures to reduce phytoplankton growth does not produce light conditions favorable to excessive growth of phytobentos.

  • Rooted macrophytes depend more on the nutrient content of the sediment than of the water column.

  • Macrophytes are relatively insensitive to control by nutrient flushing.

  • One must consider the overall impact of controlling macrophytes vs controlling phytoplankton.
 
021114